Greenland talks should avoid military rhetoric, Sen. Rand Paul says

Sen. Rand Paul said aggressive talk about using military force in connection with Greenland would be counterproductive and said lawmakers on both sides of the aisle would oppose an invasion; he framed the exchange as part of a broader debate over the War Powers Act.

Sen. Rand Paul criticized aggressive military talk around Greenland and urged calmer diplomacy. He said hostile language would make Greenlanders less willing to sell territory. The comments came during an interview that also discussed the War Powers Act and how decisions to use force are made. Key points: - Paul said that talking about invading or forcing a sale would likely backfire and reduce willingness to sell Greenland. - The interview included a note that the White House had said a military option for Greenland was not off the table. - Paul linked the remarks to the War Powers Act debate and said the issue raises whether the public has a say in decisions to go to war. Summary: The exchange underscores tensions between public rhetoric about military options and the political and legal limits on using force. It highlights a broader debate over the War Powers Act and who decides when the United States takes military action. Undetermined at this time.