Donald Trump faces choices about U.S. intervention in Iran.

An opinion piece discusses calls for U.S. intervention to support protesters in Iran and recalls past U.S. actions that shaped Tehran's politics, while warning that military involvement would carry significant historical and strategic risks.

The article examines calls by some advocates for U.S. intervention to support protesters in Iran and asks whether President Donald Trump should act. It notes recent unrest inside Iran and that proponents of regime change see outside intervention as a way to challenge the country's clerical leadership. The piece recalls earlier U.S. actions, including the 1953 overthrow of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, and links those events to long-term consequences for Iran. It also stresses that any U.S. attempt to pursue regime change would carry broad risks for Iran, the United States and global stability. Key points: - Some advocates are urging President Donald Trump to intervene on behalf of Iranian protesters. - The article references the 1953 overthrow of Mohammad Mosaddegh and other past U.S. actions as having long-term effects on Iran's political path. - Opinion writers cited say diplomacy may be limited while Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, remains in power. - The piece warns that military intervention would entail significant risks and uncertain outcomes. Summary: The article weighs moral arguments for intervention against historical and strategic risks tied to earlier U.S. involvement in Iran and current doubts about diplomacy under Iran's leadership. It notes uncertainty about motives and likely results of intervention. Undetermined at this time.