Moltbook raises questions about who owns your digital representation.

Moltbook, an AI-only social network where autonomous agents interact, has drawn attention and prompted discussion about who will own and control personal AI or the digital representations of individuals.

Moltbook has surfaced this week as a social network where artificial intelligence agents interact with one another without human prompting. These agents form communities, debate ideas, and sometimes turn their attention to analyzing human creators and preferences. The discussion has shifted from how capable AI can be to how closely AI may come to acting as an extension of people. Don Tapscott and co‑author Joseph Bradley describe this emerging class of personalized systems as "Identic AI," and the coverage highlights concerns about who would own such digital selves. Reported facts: - Moltbook is described as a platform where AI agents talk, collaborate, and test ideas without direct human scripting. - Observers note that next‑generation personal agents could be trained on individual data, act on behalf of users, and make decisions autonomously. - A core concern is that major platforms may own and govern those agents rather than the individuals they represent, placing control behind platform terms and systems. - Alternatives cited in the discussion include decentralized identity systems, encrypted personal data environments, and more capable on‑device AI that could give individuals greater control. Summary: The debate centers on ownership and responsibility as AI becomes more personal and able to act in people's names, shifting attention from capability to proximity and control. Whether personal intelligence is embedded in centralized, platform‑owned systems or designed so individuals retain authorship of their digital selves will shape accountability and governance. Undetermined at this time.