Ruben Amorim's clash with Jason Wilcox may expose boardroom power

The article reports Ruben Amorim left Manchester United with a full payout after disagreements with sporting director Jason Wilcox, and it says executives including Sir Jim Ratcliffe influenced tactical direction at the club.

Ruben Amorim's departure from Manchester United is presented as rooted in internal disagreements over tactics and club control. The article reports that Amorim left with a full payout and that sporting director Jason Wilcox pushed for changes to the coach's preferred system. It also notes reported influence from owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe on style and personnel decisions. The piece places the episode in a wider context of executives exerting greater control over football strategy. Key points: - The article reports Amorim left Manchester United with a full payout and no reduction clause. - Jason Wilcox is described as having urged Amorim to abandon his preferred 3-4-3 system. - The article cites reports that Sir Jim Ratcliffe has expressed clear tactical preferences and that executives have taken a leading role in style decisions. - The author frames this episode as part of a broader trend of boardroom influence reducing coaching autonomy. Summary: The article suggests the reported clashes between Amorim and senior executives, including Jason Wilcox and Sir Jim Ratcliffe, were central to Amorim's exit and reflects a shift toward executive-led decision making at top clubs. Undetermined at this time.