Harvey Weinstein says jurors were bullied into convicting him

Harvey Weinstein has asked a New York judge to toss his conviction, saying jurors faced verbal pressure during deliberations; the judge is expected to decide whether to set aside the verdict, order a hearing, or let it stand.

Harvey Weinstein returned to court seeking to have his 2025 New York conviction thrown out, saying jurors were bullied during deliberations. His lawyers submitted sworn statements from jurors who reported verbal aggression and fear that they say affected the outcome. Prosecutors say the judge was told about isolated tensions during the trial and handled them, and they dispute the later juror accounts. The judge is scheduled to respond and could set aside the conviction, order further inquiry, or leave the verdict in place. Key points: - Weinstein's lawyers say two jurors gave sworn statements saying they felt pressured and voted against their belief. - One juror had complained in court during deliberations about being shunned and later said they feared for their safety. - Prosecutors describe the incidents as scattered tensions and say the judge addressed them during the trial. - The judge could set aside the conviction, order a hearing, or let the verdict stand; prosecutors have said they are prepared to retry a charge the jury did not resolve. Summary: The court will determine whether the reported juror tensions were sufficient to undermine the verdict, and that decision may be appealed. Prosecutors have indicated they may retry the unresolved charge, and other appeals and related proceedings remain active.