Trump's Venezuela strike may not shift voter focus

The article reports President Trump ordered a military strike on Venezuela and that polls show limited public support while many Americans remain focused on healthcare and affordability.

President Trump ordered a military strike in Venezuela, which the article reports took place on January 3. The piece highlights that the action intersects with earlier promises to avoid "endless wars" and to prioritize domestic issues. It notes that many critics and some supporters see domestic implications as central to understanding the strike. The article places the operation alongside voter worries about healthcare, inflation and affordability. Key points: - The article reports the U.S. attacked Venezuela on January 3 and that the president ordered the operation. - A Reuters/Ipsos poll cited in the article found about 33% support for the strike and 72% of respondents worried the U.S. would become too involved. - The article notes public attention remains focused on domestic issues such as healthcare, the cost of living and approval ratings on economic policies. - The article reports critics say the strike could benefit U.S. oil companies and references the president's comments about oil and potential reimbursements. Summary: The article argues the strike was, in part, an attempt to shift attention from domestic difficulties but that public support appears limited and many Americans remain focused on affordability and healthcare. It also reports critics view the action as aligned with oil industry interests. Undetermined at this time.