US senators express doubts about military options for Iran

Several U.S. senators questioned the effectiveness of military strikes on Iran amid large anti-government protests; officials are reported to brief the president on options, including cyber and potential military measures, on Tuesday.

U.S. lawmakers from both major parties raised doubts about whether military action is the right response to unrest in Iran, where widespread protests have prompted a stern response from the Revolutionary Guards. President Donald Trump has left open the possibility of U.S. intervention, and media reports say administration officials will brief him on options. Some senators warned that force could strengthen nationalist sentiment in Iran rather than weaken the government. Public figures outside Iran have also offered competing views on how to respond. Key facts: - President Trump has left open the possibility of U.S. intervention in Iran amid large protests. - Senator Rand Paul expressed doubt that military strikes would achieve their intended effect, and Senator Mark Warner warned such action could unite Iranians behind their government. - The Wall Street Journal reported U.S. military and diplomatic officials will brief the president on Tuesday about options, including cyber measures and potential military action. - Iran said it would target U.S. military bases if the United States launches an attack. - Senator Lindsey Graham urged more forceful measures to support protesters, and Reza Pahlavi said he is prepared to return to Iran to help lead a transition. Summary: Lawmakers are publicly debating the risks and consequences of military action as Iran faces significant unrest. Officials are scheduled to brief the president on available options on Tuesday, and the final U.S. approach is undetermined at this time.