Greenland rare-earth plans face 'absurd' label from experts

Experts warn that U.S. political interest in Greenland’s rare-earth deposits is commercially impractical because of low ore grades, harsh conditions and continued reliance on Chinese processing, while markets have pushed up shares of companies with Greenland exposure.

U.S. political leaders have renewed interest in Greenland's rare-earth deposits, citing national security and critical-minerals concerns. That rhetoric has coincided with sharp moves in markets for companies tied to Greenland projects. Industry experts say the commercial case is weak because of geology, climate and processing realities. The article reports these views and notes investor reactions without indicating a near-term project approval. Key points: - The article reports that President Trump revived talk of acquiring Greenland and considered a range of options, which coincided with investor attention. - Markets reacted: the article mentions large share jumps for companies with Greenland projects, including Critical Metals Corp and Energy Transition Minerals. - Experts say Greenland deposits tend to have low rare-earth concentrations (often below 1%), the terrain and weather are challenging, and substantial processing capacity still resides in China. - Analysts quoted in the article say any Greenland production would likely be years away and that political rhetoric has outpaced commercial feasibility. Summary: The political focus on Greenland has driven market interest, but experts cited in the article emphasize significant geological, logistical and processing obstacles that limit short-term impact. The article notes that current processing capacity remains concentrated in China and that Greenland projects are unlikely to change that quickly. Undetermined at this time.