Washington Post urges Supreme Court to save women's sports ahead of trans athlete cases

The Washington Post editorial urged the Supreme Court to allow states to bar biological males from competing in women's sports. The Court will hear Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. on Tuesday, and the timing of any decision is undetermined.

The Washington Post published an editorial urging the Supreme Court to preserve women's sports by allowing states to restrict participation in female athletics to biological females. The piece was released days before the Court is scheduled to hear two cases that address those limits. The cases named Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. focus on whether states may bar biological males from competing in women's school and college sports. Nearly 30 states have laws that restrict transgender athletes' participation, and the timing of any Supreme Court decisions remains undetermined. Key points: - The Washington Post editorial urged the Supreme Court to allow states to bar biological males from competing in women's sports. - The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. on Tuesday. - Nearly 30 states have laws restricting transgender athletes' participation, and the timing of a Supreme Court decision is undetermined. Summary: The Washington Post framed the upcoming arguments as an opportunity for the Supreme Court to resolve disputes over sex-based eligibility rules in school and college athletics. The next formal step is the Court's oral arguments on Tuesday; a decision date is undetermined.