Supreme Court to hear cases from former college athletes on women's sports

Two related cases challenging state laws on transgender athletes in women's sports are scheduled for argument at the U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 13, and the plaintiffs include former college track athletes who joined Little v. Hecox; more than 50 amicus briefs, including filings from 27 states and the U.S. government, have been submitted.

The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear two related cases that challenge state laws affecting participation in women's sports. The cases named in reporting are Little v. Hecox and State of West Virginia v. B.P.J., and argument is set for Jan. 13. The reporting notes that former college track athletes joined one of the lawsuits and spoke about the matter on Fox & Friends First. Dozens of organizations and multiple state governments filed friend-of-the-court briefs ahead of the hearing. Key details: - The plaintiffs include former college athletes who joined Little v. Hecox with legal assistance from Alliance Defending Freedom. - The Supreme Court will hear Little v. Hecox alongside State of West Virginia v. B.P.J. on Jan. 13. - More than 50 amicus briefs were filed, including submissions from women's groups, scientists, other advocacy organizations, 27 states, and the U.S. government. - Several briefs ask the justices to allow enforcement of state laws that limit participation in women's sports in order to preserve separate categories for female athletes. Summary: The parties involved say the cases raise questions about whether states may enforce laws that define or limit participation in women's athletic competitions. The Supreme Court hearing is scheduled for Jan. 13. Further legal outcomes and any timetable for a decision are undetermined at this time.