← NewsAll
Sex personality quizzes are becoming a common way to describe people's sex lives.
Summary
Quizzes such as Dr Tara Suwinyattichaiporn's Sexual Profile, the Erotic Blueprint and Ferly's Turn Yourself On are being used to give people language for sexual preferences, and experts say labels can help communication while also carrying stigma or becoming overly rigid.
Content
Personality-style quizzes and frameworks that map sexual preferences are appearing more often. Examples include Dr Tara Suwinyattichaiporn's 24-question Sexual Profile, the Erotic Blueprint highlighted on Goop, and Ferly founders' Turn Yourself On. Creators and some therapists say these tools give people words to describe desire and pleasure. At the same time, researchers and sociologists warn labels can carry stigma or be interpreted too rigidly.
Key points:
- Several new quizzes and guides aim to describe sexual preferences and give people language for desire, pleasure and relationship approaches.
- Survey findings cited in the article report that about 35% of women say they are not reaching peak sexual pleasure and around one third of Brits wish they talked more with partners about pleasure, with other data noting nearly one in five UK couples are sexless and 51% report mismatched libidos (as reported in the article).
- Experts quoted in the piece say labels can help people articulate preferences (Lucy Frank), provide conversation starters (Dr Tara Suwinyattichaiporn), and reduce self-blame when people can name experiences (Billie Quinlan), while others warn that terms like "kinky" mean different things to different people (Justin Lehmiller) and that some labels attract negative assumptions (Ryan Scoats).
- Writers and clinicians in the article note sexuality can be fluid, that labels can sometimes become performative or limiting, and that using labels is presented as a starting point rather than a fixed identity.
Summary:
These sexual-profile tools are portrayed as ways to expand vocabulary around desire and to prompt conversation between partners, and the article reports both benefits and cautions. Experts and authors in the piece suggest labels can open discussion and help people name experiences, but they also note stigma, varied meanings and the risk of treating types as permanent. Some contributors mention revisiting profiles over time as one way people have used them. Undetermined at this time.
